Monthly Archives: March 2025

Autism: Criticism and Self Doubt

Inez Garcia 1974

Growing up on the Autism spectrum, being constantly criticized for my behaviour, often justifiably so, created tremendous self-doubt.

This criticism made it easy for people to convince me that behaviour that I felt was entirely appropriate was in fact, unacceptable.

Lately, I’ve read James Clear’s Atomic Habits, in which he states that a habit he has ingrained is that he has to write every day.  He only has to write one line, but the habit he’s ingrained is, he has to write every day.  That, he says, is how he became a writer.

I was born a writer.

In my early teens I wrote poetry, the words flowing from an inner source that moved my pen across the page.  I could easily express emotion and lead my audience to exactly where I wanted to take them. 

People listened attentively and responded with enthusiasm.  For me, it was as natural as breathing.

Then I bound myself into a relationship with a much older man.  A well-educated man who had studied the classics and philosophy. A man raised in an atmosphere of Emily Post’s Blue Book of Etiquette. A man who denigrated my writing.

One day, in a passionate sense of injustice I wrote poetically about an incident that I heard about in the news. 

The news article featured a woman of strong character–Inez Garcia. A woman who was raped. Two men assaulted her, one of whom weighed over three hundred pounds.  He held her down, while the other man raped her.  When they were done, they let her go.  Threats against her life were uttered.  Incensed and traumatized, she went home. She grabbed her son’s gun. She hunted one man down. Shot and killed him. The other man fled. 

I wrote the ballad in her defense when she was arrested and charged with first degree murder.

My husband was shocked. It was 1974 and the very thought that I would dare to write about rape–a forbidden subject—offended him.  That I could even consider defending the woman he found despicable.  The thought of me submitting the ballad to any publication appalled him.  He told me to burn it.

At the time, Women’s Rights and the Chicano Movement were gaining ground in the San Francisco Bay area.  When news of Garcia’s plight became known, feminists took up her cause, and Garcia herself became a speaker addressing women’s groups.

According to Wikipedia, I was not the only woman to take up the pen in Garcia’s defense.

As a cause celebre, her (Inez Garcia’s) case inspired numerous works of art and music, including the Beverly Grant folk song “Inez”, performed with the group The Human Condition; Marge Piercy’s poem “For Inez Garcia”;[5] and Jayne Cortez’s poem “Rape.”[6]

These women became noted for their work in Garcia’s defense and went on to become well published writers.

As for me, I didn’t burn my ballad, but I did essentially fold up my writing persona and immerse myself in motherhood and housekeeping.

That I gave up writing at that point in my life was not my husband’s fault.  It was entirely mine, for giving his opinion so much weight, and my own so little recognition.

Years later and in a more progressive relationship, I entered a university undergraduate program where I studied literature, including contemporary poetry. Writing that I found surprisingly reminiscent of my early work. 

And by degrees I learned to trust myself to write again, encouraged by professors who recognized my latent talent and helped me publish.

But the process is not the same. It’s a constant battle to put my writing first, to allow myself to sit down and open that channel. 

This is my continued fascination with Atomic Habits:  sooner or later the habit of sitting down to write will be ingrained, and I will once again, see myself as a writer.

If you are having self-doubts, if you feel that what you believe is worthwhile is being negated by everyone around you, don’t give up and please, don’t give in. 

Trust yourself, and find your place in this world.  It’s waiting for you.

Inez Garcia was retried and exonerated after serving two years in prison.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inez_Garc%C3%ADa  Research data’

Tagged , , , , , ,

Navigating Relationships: Insights from Autism and Philosophy

Growing up on the autism spectrum, I never understood power in personal relationships.  I naively assumed that as adults, people would just naturally treat each other with respect and acceptance. 

People would want what was best for themselves and for the other person.

And in the workplace that would translate to balancing out the needs of the client, with the efficiency and profitability of the firm, while developing processes which would enable workers to do the best possible job with efficiency, pride and productivity.  For a fair wage.

Once I found myself in the ‘real’ world, I had no idea how to navigate the stresses and anxieties of very different personalities malfunctioning together in the work place.

I once complained to my sister that in the personal relationship I was then immersed in, I was the only powerless person.  I was sobbing.  Her response was straightforward:  You have the power, Marg.  You just don’t use it.

The truth? I didn’t know how.

I’ve learned to hold my own since then.  And recently I’ve found two books that clearly speak to this issue. It’s a relief to find authors who clarify the critical aspects of successfully managing stressful interpersonal relationships. 

Because we all find ourselves in situations that require working with or being with other people. 

Situations like Life.

Ichiro Kishimi and Fumitake Koga, two Japanese authors, explore the emotional fallout that can result from coming into contact with ‘the real world’. In their book, The Courage to be Disliked they discuss the calming effects of accepting and embracing who you are.

This book does not even mention autism spectrum disorder. 

Instead, the authors talk about our response to people and situations, and how we can find contentment regardless of what others may think about who we are and what we choose to do.

The format Koga and Kishimi chose for the book is loosely based on Plato’s dialogues.  That is, it’s a plain-language conversation between a philosopher and a young man, revealing the philosophical or Adlerian keys to being true to yourself.

I enjoyed the back and forth discussion; the young man constantly challenging the concepts and ideas put forth by the philosopher.

The discussions  explore the acknowledgement that others are not always going to be aligned with your personality and goals.  In short, they examine how a person can best move forward regardless of the opinions and/or criticisms of others.

Kishimi and Koga discuss our concern about what others might think—and note that this is different from caring about others—and how that emotional involvement with what others think about us, can hinder progress toward being our best self.

It’s a clear philosophical foundation for living your life freed from the inhibiting power of what other people think.

Along the same lines, but much more in the vein of a self-help revelation is The Let Them Theory by Mel Robbins. 

Robbins covers topics from achieving your goals to making, maintaining and letting go of friendships.  Her premise is simple: Do people shun you?  Let them. Do others criticize you?  Let them.  Do they do things you would never do?  Let them.  Let go of critical judgements, critical of yourself and of others.

The letting go is only the first step.  Robbins is clear that two steps are needed for this theory to work in an emotionally healthy way. The second step is, after acknowledging the issue that makes you think, “Let them”, you will then go on to explore self-validation in a way that is satisfying to you.

Her delivery, far from being philosophical, is very personal and direct. 

As spectrum riders, we can mourn our social/political/employment situation, or lack thereof, to our heart’s content. But at some point, we have to pick up our tents and move into the real world.  And hopefully?  Make a difference, however small.

Yours truly,

Margaret Jean.

Tagged , , , , , , ,

This is How They Talk About Us…

The current image has no alternative text. The file name is: mjzeke-6.jpg

I thought it would be interesting to see what various individuals, professionals and non, have to say about us. Here is what I found:

Medical Institutions and Programs tend to view us from a broad neurological or developmental perspective. The word ‘disability’ is regrettably brought into play by the CDC.

National Institute of Mental Health:  Autism spectrum disorder is a neurological and developmental disorder that affects how people interact with others, communicate, learn, and behave.

Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a developmental disability that can cause significant social, communication and behavioral challenges.

Other institutes and services see us as having a condition, needing support. But then doesn’t everyone need support? Friends, family, therapists even?

Cleveland Clinic: Autism is a condition that affects how your child socializes and behaves. Early signs include limited eye contact and body language and repetitive motions …

National Health Services, UK: Autism is different for everyone. Autism is a spectrum. This means everybody with autism is different. Some autistic people need little or no support. Others …

Reading from Wikipedia, I wonder if we are neurodevelopmentally disordered, or if perhaps it’s everybody else? “Persistent deficits” seems a rather unhelpful terminology.

Wikipedia:  Autism spectrum disorder (ASD), or simply autism, is a neurodevelopmental disorder “characterized by persistent deficits in social communication…”

And then we come to the researchers–finally, a ray of hope!

Bright Autism: “The future of autism research is not just about finding a cure, but about understanding and embracing the diversity of the human brain.”

Psychology Today, May 13, 2024 : Autistic people may be more likely to voice concerns when made aware of inefficient processes and dysfunctional practices in the workplace than non-autistic…https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/women-with-autism-spectrum-disorder/202404/are-autistic-people-more-likely-to-speak-up-at-work

This last quote looks interesting. Well worth following up in a future blog.

What have you heard about autism? And how does it affect you? Does what other people say affect you? I know a book that can help you with that: The Courage to be Disliked by Ichiro Kishimi and Fumitake Koga. But that’s another blog altogether.

And how do we prefer to be described? A UK study gave the following results:

Sage Journals: On the preferred language to describe individuals on the spectrum: The term ‘autistic’ was endorsed by a large percentage of autistic adults, family members/friends and parents but by considerably fewer professionals; ‘person with autism’ was endorsed by almost half of professionals but by fewer autistic adults and parents.https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1362361315588200

And finally, two riders of the spectrum address the issue:

Jordan Hilkowitz Autistic Canadian CSI: “Autism is not a tragedy. Running out of bacon is a tragedy.”

Alexandra Forshaw: “Autism is not a disease. Don’t try to cure us. Try to understand us.”

Yours truly,

Margaret Jean

Tagged , , , , ,

Understanding Empathy in Autism: A Personal Reflection

How often have you read or been told that people on the spectrum have no empathy?  In my case, I can’t think of anything further from the truth!

When we were little, my older brother and I were mischievous.  Our grandfather had a beautiful vegetable and rose garden.  Manicured green lawns edged the rows of peas, cucumbers, green beans, tomatoes and root vegetables.  One day, when I was about four years old, and my brother seven, we found ourselves alone in the garden. 

My brother looked carefully around.  Then he looked at me.  Then we both looked at the fat pea pods hanging on the vines.  Before long, we had eaten quite a few, stripping the fat peas from the pods.  I picked a small cucumber when we left.  I planned to eat it later with salt from the kitchen.

With the empty pea pods hanging on the vines, it wasn’t long before the adults discovered what we’d been up to.

My brother got blamed.  He was older than me, and he was supposed to be a role model for me, not a leader in crime.  He got a whopping.

From behind the closed doors, I could hear Dad spanking my brother.  My father was a big man and my brother was a small boy.  My dad was not a gentle person, especially not when he was in a temper. 

In the next room, hearing my brother’s yelps of pain, I cried.  I cried not because I was scared, but because I was sorry for my brother.  I didn’t want my adored big brother to be hurt or humiliated and I was witnessing both.  I felt how cruel and unfair it was, for such a big man to be hurting such a little boy. I sobbed as if my heart would break for him. 

So I know for a fact that I have a solid cache of empathy in my Asperger’s heart.

Perhaps ‘flat aspect’ plays a part in how I am perceived.  I may feel very sympathetic, but my face is void of expression and emotion.   

Do you, as I do, find it embarrassing and irritating when people get annoyed with you for not responding to something they have said?  They want a reaction, and they want it now–in a time frame and a manner that they anticipate. What they term ‘normal’.

When someone tells me a story, or confides in me about an incident, I have learned to remain expressionless, while I am processing what they have said.

I may be very empathetic with the opinion or situation.  But I know all too well that my ‘take’ on the situation is probably not acceptable.

This reminds me of what Heather is quoted as saying in Chapter 14 of Spectrum Women, that she finds she experiences things differently from other people.  Yes, we do have a unique way of processing input.

While I’m thinking deeply about what  someone has just said, I’m processing the information internally. But the person I’m conversing with is looking for an immediate, recognizable verbal or visual response.

My momentary hesitation does not mean that I have no empathy or sympathy for the person or situation. Nevertheless, that is how my apparent lack of immediate response is taken. 

On the other hand, if I do bravely venture my unedited opinion, the other person is likely to express surprise, dismay or even disbelief.  So, I find it’s better to just say something neutral and polite.

And because I have been told so often that whatever opinion, emotion or response I might express is inappropriate, I will sometimes not only not speak my mind, but also mask my facial response.

This would almost certainly lead people to think I am uninterested in the conversation.   

Why do people think we lack empathy? For myself, I think flat aspect and internalizing my perceptions may well account for this result. Inside, I may be roiling with emotion. Outwardly, I seem detached. Am I the only one?

Tagged , ,